back to Blog

Which of AMD’s 9800X3D or 9950X, for 3D artists and game developers.


Introduction

In the high-end processor market, AMD continues to innovate and stand out. With its Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 9 lineups, the company offers powerful solutions tailored to the needs of 3D artists and developers. This article aims to help you choose the processor best suited to your specific needs between the 9800X3D and the 9950X.

This analysis focuses on four processors in the Ryzen family:

– Ryzen 7 9800X3D
– Ryzen 9 9950x
– Ryzen 7 7800x3D
– Ryzen 9 7950x

The tests

To do this, we carried out the following tests:

– Cinébench R23: Monocœur, Multicore
– Blender: BMW CPU
– PCMARK10: Video, Audio, Rendu
– 7Zip: Compression, Decompression

Builds and settings

The tests were conducted on OSHKO computers with the following components:

– Carte graphique: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 16GB
– RAM: 64GB 5600MHz
– Stockage: 1TB m.2 PCIe 990 PRO

The processors Technical specifications

Performance Analysis of results

Cinebench points

Advantages of having more cores and threads

Cores are the main processing units of a processor, while threads are virtual “execution lines” managed by each core through technologies like hyperthreading.

A high number of cores and threads allows the processor to handle a greater number of tasks simultaneously.

Singlecore performance:

The 9950X clearly stands out as the best with a score of 2,236. The progression between the different models is relatively gradual, reflecting consistent gains, likely due to architectural improvements and other technological advancements.

Multicore performance:

The differences in Multicore performance are significant. For example, the 9950X shows an increase of more than 50% compared to the 7800X3D. This gap is primarily due to a larger number of cores and threads, as well as optimized parallel workload management.

Singlecore /Multicore performance ratio:

The 7800X3D and 9800X3D stand out for their good balance between Singlecore and Multicore scores, making them versatile for a variety of uses.

On the other hand, the 9950X and the 7950X prioritize highly parallelized tasks, with significantly higher Multicore scores.

Optimal usage:

7800X3D / 9800X3D: Ideal for everyday use or moderate gaming, where Singlecore performance is crucial.

9950X / 7950X: Designed for intensive professional workloads, such as 3D rendering, video processing, or other applications requiring high Multicore performance.

Cinebench frequencies

Single-core frequency analysis:

The 9950X and 7950X both demonstrate higher single-core frequencies than the 7800X3D and 9800X3D, confirming their high-end positioning and their ability to handle more demanding applications.

These performance advantages also justify their higher prices, especially for users seeking maximum performance.

Multicore frequency analysis:

Leading the pack here, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D stands out with a multicore frequency reaching 5200 MHz, making it the most powerful processor for this type of workload. It shows an impressive ability to handle intense multi-threaded tasks, slightly outpacing the Ryzen 9 9950X, which boasts a 4900 MHz multicore frequency.

Meanwhile, the Ryzen 9 7950X competes with the 9800X3D by hitting 5000 MHz in multicore. This result highlights its strong frequency optimization for multicore tasks, making it an excellent choice in this segment.

Lastly, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D lags slightly with a 4700 MHz multicore frequency. Although it’s the least powerful of the four processors in this context, it remains competent and well-suited for demanding tasks, albeit a bit less optimized for maximizing multi-threaded performance.

Overall, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D dominates this comparison with its high multicore frequencies, while the Ryzen 9 9950X follows closely behind, offering respectable performance but falling slightly short.

Blender (BMW CPU)

Comparisons between the Ryzen 9 9950X and the other models:

– 9950x vs 7800x3D : 53 % faster.
– 9950x vs 9800x3D : 37 % faster.
– 9950x vs 7950x : 10 % faster.

Comparative analysis:

Thanks to their high core and thread counts, the 9950X and 7950X deliver outstanding performance for intensive 3D rendering tasks, significantly reducing processing times. For 3D professionals seeking optimal performance in Blender or other 3D rendering software, these two Ryzen 9 processors are an excellent choice.

However, the 9800X3D and 7800X3D offer a great compromise in terms of performance-to-price ratio, making them particularly well-suited for smaller-scale projects or more limited budgets.

PCMARK10 – Productivity

Comparative Analysis:

PCMARK10 scores evaluate performance in various productivity scenarios, such as video editing, rendering, and photo editing. These tasks benefit from both the raw power of the CPU cores and the efficiency of their architecture.

Video: The 9950X and 7950X stand out with their video editing performance, especially the 9950X, which outperforms both Ryzen 7 processors by more than 16%. This performance gain is significant for demanding video tasks involving heavy data streams.

Rendering: The 9950X leads the pack with an impressive score of 23,554 points, followed closely by the 7950X. The two Ryzen 7 processors offer respectable performance, but there is a notable gap, particularly compared to the 9950X, which is roughly 27% faster than the 7800X3D.

Photo: In photo editing, the two Ryzen 9 models maintain their lead, though the gap with the 9800X3D is more moderate (around 10%).

7Zip – Compression and decompression

Comparative Analysis:

The results reveal a clear advantage of the 9950X over the 9800X3D, particularly in decompression tasks. This superiority is due to the increased number of cores and threads in the 9950X, allowing it to process a significantly larger volume of compressed data simultaneously.

Compression: The 9950X achieves a score of 191,104 GIPS, representing approximately a 62% improvement compared to the 7800X3D. The 7950X closely follows, with only a 5% difference compared to the 9950X.

Decompression: The decompression results are even more remarkable. The 9950X delivers a score of 258,958 GIPS, marking a 99% increase over the 7800X3D. Both Ryzen 9 processors excel with nearly identical performance, emphasizing their shared optimization for tasks of this nature.

Conclusion: Which processor for which usage?

All four AMD processors offer remarkable performance but cater to different needs. The 9800X3D and 7800X3D stand out for their excellent value for money and energy efficiency, making them an ideal choice for gamers and users looking for a versatile solution.

Meanwhile, the 9950X and 7950X excel with their raw computing power and their ability to handle intensive workloads, perfectly matching the expectations of content creators and professionals.

Ultimately, your choice will depend on your priorities: an optimized solution for gaming and moderate tasks with the two Ryzen 7 3D processors, or a “war machine” for demanding projects with the 9800X3D and the 7800X3D. In any case, AMD continues to push the boundaries by offering processors suited to every type of user, ensuring both performance and reliability.